<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Republicans Issue Terrible RFP for Their Web Site</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/republicans-issue-terrible-rfp-for-their-web-site/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/republicans-issue-terrible-rfp-for-their-web-site?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=republicans-issue-terrible-rfp-for-their-web-site</link>
	<description>Confessions of a Non-Profit Web Architect</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 15:49:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DRS</title>
		<link>http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/republicans-issue-terrible-rfp-for-their-web-site/comment-page-1#comment-100979</link>
		<dc:creator>DRS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/?p=3832#comment-100979</guid>
		<description>So, what would a good RFP example be?  I&#039;m not certain if it&#039;s all that bad if they are going through a more lengthy discovery process rather than a lengthy RFP development process.  As the ACLU RFP writer mentioned, they have specific needs that they know that they have, so it&#039;s taken a year to write a 40 page requirements document.  Perhaps the RNC is wanting a partnership discovery process here, I&#039;m not sure.  I&#039;d be interested to find out what a &quot;great&quot; RFP is if this is a &quot;bad&quot; one.  Anyone have thoughts on what should be included in a &quot;great&quot; RFP? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, what would a good RFP example be?  I&#039;m not certain if it&#039;s all that bad if they are going through a more lengthy discovery process rather than a lengthy RFP development process.  As the ACLU RFP writer mentioned, they have specific needs that they know that they have, so it&#039;s taken a year to write a 40 page requirements document.  Perhaps the RNC is wanting a partnership discovery process here, I&#039;m not sure.  I&#039;d be interested to find out what a &quot;great&quot; RFP is if this is a &quot;bad&quot; one.  Anyone have thoughts on what should be included in a &quot;great&quot; RFP? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mgtmcki</title>
		<link>http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/republicans-issue-terrible-rfp-for-their-web-site/comment-page-1#comment-100557</link>
		<dc:creator>mgtmcki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 13:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/?p=3832#comment-100557</guid>
		<description>I find this article completely subjective.  Being ambitious and vague is outside the box.  If this RFP step is the first of a few back and fourths between &quot;illusionary&quot; wants, technical speaking and marketing, it could end having a great end result.  Besides, I have never heard of a successful RFP.  It&#039;s an archaic &quot;best&quot; (mediocre) practice and obviously is too emotional by those who feel they know a good RFP vs. those that take a stab at creating one.  Bravo to at least recognizing the need for a redesign -- that&#039;s most out of the box. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find this article completely subjective.  Being ambitious and vague is outside the box.  If this RFP step is the first of a few back and fourths between &quot;illusionary&quot; wants, technical speaking and marketing, it could end having a great end result.  Besides, I have never heard of a successful RFP.  It&#039;s an archaic &quot;best&quot; (mediocre) practice and obviously is too emotional by those who feel they know a good RFP vs. those that take a stab at creating one.  Bravo to at least recognizing the need for a redesign &#8212; that&#039;s most out of the box. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan Benamer</title>
		<link>http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/republicans-issue-terrible-rfp-for-their-web-site/comment-page-1#comment-100329</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan Benamer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 02:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/?p=3832#comment-100329</guid>
		<description>Ha! Not as lonely as it was for the left after 9/11. I&#039;m sure the Republicans will have their day again. I just hope it&#039;s not for a few more years yet and that they come back to power because they actually revamp parts of their philosophy on governing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha! Not as lonely as it was for the left after 9/11. I&#8217;m sure the Republicans will have their day again. I just hope it&#8217;s not for a few more years yet and that they come back to power because they actually revamp parts of their philosophy on governing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EdCoyne</title>
		<link>http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/republicans-issue-terrible-rfp-for-their-web-site/comment-page-1#comment-100326</link>
		<dc:creator>EdCoyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/?p=3832#comment-100326</guid>
		<description>It sure is lonely, out here in conservative techland. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sure is lonely, out here in conservative techland. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc B</title>
		<link>http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/republicans-issue-terrible-rfp-for-their-web-site/comment-page-1#comment-100274</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/?p=3832#comment-100274</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s just wait and see, shall we?  I, for one, am not holding my breath. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#039;s just wait and see, shall we?  I, for one, am not holding my breath. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What we&#8217;re reading, week of 3/9 &#171; i On Nonprofits</title>
		<link>http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/republicans-issue-terrible-rfp-for-their-web-site/comment-page-1#comment-100260</link>
		<dc:creator>What we&#8217;re reading, week of 3/9 &#171; i On Nonprofits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/?p=3832#comment-100260</guid>
		<description>[...] Non-Profit Tech Blog&#8230; Republicans Issue Terrible RFP for Their Web Site The dialogue continues on website design! Allan Benamer does a point-by-point analysis of how not to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Non-Profit Tech Blog&#8230; Republicans Issue Terrible RFP for Their Web Site The dialogue continues on website design! Allan Benamer does a point-by-point analysis of how not to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan Benamer</title>
		<link>http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/republicans-issue-terrible-rfp-for-their-web-site/comment-page-1#comment-100244</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan Benamer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/?p=3832#comment-100244</guid>
		<description>Thanks Sarah, I&#039;m crossing my fingers and hope that Steele stays at least til 2012 for the Repubs. We must increase the RFP gap! But who knows??? What if they do get a kickass web site out of the RFP? I&#039;ll have a few hats to eat... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Sarah, I&#039;m crossing my fingers and hope that Steele stays at least til 2012 for the Repubs. We must increase the RFP gap! But who knows??? What if they do get a kickass web site out of the RFP? I&#039;ll have a few hats to eat&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Davies</title>
		<link>http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/republicans-issue-terrible-rfp-for-their-web-site/comment-page-1#comment-100242</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/?p=3832#comment-100242</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s fascinating!  Thanks Allan.  Having just spent nearly a year producing a 40 page RFP for ACLU of Washington, it&#039;s good to see that we&#039;re winning the myrfpisbetterthanyourrfp wars. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#039;s fascinating!  Thanks Allan.  Having just spent nearly a year producing a 40 page RFP for ACLU of Washington, it&#039;s good to see that we&#039;re winning the myrfpisbetterthanyourrfp wars. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan Benamer</title>
		<link>http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/republicans-issue-terrible-rfp-for-their-web-site/comment-page-1#comment-100232</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan Benamer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 04:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/?p=3832#comment-100232</guid>
		<description>Thanks, you&#039;ve got a nice blog over there. Love the interview with Helen Thomas (then again, I&#039;m a Helen Thomas fan) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, you&#039;ve got a nice blog over there. Love the interview with Helen Thomas (then again, I&#039;m a Helen Thomas fan) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erica</title>
		<link>http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/republicans-issue-terrible-rfp-for-their-web-site/comment-page-1#comment-100231</link>
		<dc:creator>Erica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 03:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/?p=3832#comment-100231</guid>
		<description>Great post, thanks for putting all this information together.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, thanks for putting all this information together.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
