<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Change.org is now on Facebook!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/changeorg-is-now-on-facebook/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/changeorg-is-now-on-facebook</link>
	<description>Confessions of a Non-Profit Executive Director</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:12:34 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill Templeton</title>
		<link>http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/changeorg-is-now-on-facebook/comment-page-1#comment-29635</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Templeton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 02:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/changeorg-is-now-on-facebook#comment-29635</guid>
		<description>I give credit to Change for making the gutsy decision to invest time and effort into building a Facebook app, given that Causes already has a one month/1.2M user lead and a very similar, if not the same, service.

Given their similarity and reliance on growing a network of supporters, it seems like this will be a winner-take-all market.  In any case, competition is healthy so may the best app win, even if Causes is way out in front now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I give credit to Change for making the gutsy decision to invest time and effort into building a Facebook app, given that Causes already has a one month/1.2M user lead and a very similar, if not the same, service.</p>
<p>Given their similarity and reliance on growing a network of supporters, it seems like this will be a winner-take-all market.  In any case, competition is healthy so may the best app win, even if Causes is way out in front now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan Benamer</title>
		<link>http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/changeorg-is-now-on-facebook/comment-page-1#comment-29371</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan Benamer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/changeorg-is-now-on-facebook#comment-29371</guid>
		<description>Actually, I DID invite all my friends to the Change.org app and it just let it through. It didn&#039;t ask me to invite ten at a time. I wonder if approved apps have that regulator turned off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I DID invite all my friends to the Change.org app and it just let it through. It didn&#8217;t ask me to invite ten at a time. I wonder if approved apps have that regulator turned off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Rattray</title>
		<link>http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/changeorg-is-now-on-facebook/comment-page-1#comment-29365</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Rattray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/changeorg-is-now-on-facebook#comment-29365</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the post Allan.  I still haven&#039;t gone to bed, although I feel like I&#039;m sleepwalking at this point :-)

Unfortunately I can say with near certainty that we won&#039;t be matching the same wild growth of the few dozen applications that had early access to the Facebook Platform, Causes among them.  The primary reason for the viral growth of these applications was the ability for people to send private messages to all of their friends at once inviting them to the service, which  drove the applications exponentially.  However, Facebook dramatically curtailed this just about a week ago and now only allows users to invite up to 10 friends a day to an application.  (Most users on Facebook have several hundred friends.)  This more or less eliminates the possibility of going viral based simply on mathematics.  (Since only a small % of people invite their friends and a small % of those accept, you need numbers much larger than 10 invites to really go viral.)  In fact, if you look at the few hundred applications submitted in the last week or so, only a handful have more than 10,000 users, showing the dramatic decline in growth.

Nonetheless, I think in the long run the inital explosive growth of users is going to be less relevant than it currently seems.  Either way, I think it&#039;s important for all of us - Change.org, Project Agape, and others - to keep our eyes on the real goal at hand: not just acquiring new users, but translating that into deep, long-term engagement in social issues and with organizations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post Allan.  I still haven&#8217;t gone to bed, although I feel like I&#8217;m sleepwalking at this point <img src='http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Unfortunately I can say with near certainty that we won&#8217;t be matching the same wild growth of the few dozen applications that had early access to the Facebook Platform, Causes among them.  The primary reason for the viral growth of these applications was the ability for people to send private messages to all of their friends at once inviting them to the service, which  drove the applications exponentially.  However, Facebook dramatically curtailed this just about a week ago and now only allows users to invite up to 10 friends a day to an application.  (Most users on Facebook have several hundred friends.)  This more or less eliminates the possibility of going viral based simply on mathematics.  (Since only a small % of people invite their friends and a small % of those accept, you need numbers much larger than 10 invites to really go viral.)  In fact, if you look at the few hundred applications submitted in the last week or so, only a handful have more than 10,000 users, showing the dramatic decline in growth.</p>
<p>Nonetheless, I think in the long run the inital explosive growth of users is going to be less relevant than it currently seems.  Either way, I think it&#8217;s important for all of us &#8211; Change.org, Project Agape, and others &#8211; to keep our eyes on the real goal at hand: not just acquiring new users, but translating that into deep, long-term engagement in social issues and with organizations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
