<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule">

<channel>
	<title>Non-Profit Tech Blog &#187; CI Host</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/category/ci-host/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nonprofittechblog.org</link>
	<description>Confessions of a Non-Profit Executive Director</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 19:31:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/</creativeCommons:license>		<item>
		<title>More about the security problems at Convio</title>
		<link>http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/more-about-the-security-problems-at-convio?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=more-about-the-security-problems-at-convio</link>
		<comments>http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/more-about-the-security-problems-at-convio#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 01:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allan Benamer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CI Host]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Convio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nptech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Working Assets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/more-about-the-security-problems-at-convio</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The progressive blogosphere is also reporting issues with Convio mainly through ActForChange which is run by Working Assets: Dear Subscriber, We regret to inform you that the company we contract with to provide online services, Convio, has identified a breach of one of their internet security systems. There was no breach of personally-identifiable information or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/conviologo.gif' alt='Convio Logo' /><br />
<img src="http://www.wald.com/_img/WA_logo.gif" alt="Working Assets Logo" /><br />
<img src="http://www.cihost.com/images/main/cihost-logo.gif" alt="CI Host Logo" /></p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&#038;address=389x2201304">progressive</a> <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/11/4/1513/44127">blogosphere </a>is also reporting issues with Convio mainly through ActForChange which is run by Working Assets:<br />
<span id="more-3274"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Dear Subscriber,</p>
<p>We regret to inform you that the company we contract with to provide online services, Convio, has identified a breach of one of their internet security systems. There was no breach of personally-identifiable information or credit card data, but your email address and password for managing your Act For Change and Working For Change subscriptions were obtained by an unauthorized third party.</p></blockquote>
<p>A user at <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/11/4/1513/44127">Daily Kos</a> claiming to be the political director at Working Assets says the following:</p>
<blockquote><p>unfortunately, this is real. convio was the subject of a malicious hacking attack and some of our members were affected as a result of their security breach.</p>
<p>we take security very, very seriously. please note: the database holding account information related to Working Assets long distance, wireless and credit card accounts was not affected. </p></blockquote>
<p>Another user claims that Convio&#8217;s problems stemmed from a <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/11/02/chicaco_datacenter_breaches/">break-in at the hosting provider that Convio uses in Chicago, CI Host</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>In the most recent incident, &#8220;at least two masked intruders entered the suite after cutting into the reinforced walls with a power saw,&#8221; according to a letter C I Host officials sent customers. &#8220;During the robbery, C I Host&#8217;s night manager was repeatedly tazered and struck with a blunt instrument. After violently attacking the manager, the intruders stole equipment belonging to C I Host and its customers.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Tad Druart, Convio&#8217;s Communications Director, says that the break-in and the Convio security breach are not related to each other.  I&#8217;m only posting this because a <a href="http://www.robtex.com/dns/getactive.com.html">quick DNS lookup on getactive.com shows that ns3.getactive.com is listed at CI Host</a>. If you <a href="http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/tracert.ch?ip=ns3.getactive.com">traceroute to it</a>, you get CI Host as the last stop before the packets fall behind a firewall. That said, I think Convio should probably leave CI Host as a hosting provider as that is apparently the FOURTH break-in in two years at the Chicago location. Can anyone say &#8220;inside job&#8221;? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nonprofittechblog.org/more-about-the-security-problems-at-convio/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

